Thursday, October 20, 2005

Political participation via mobile devices: Its an engagement tool that is still in its early stages here in the U.S. In 2004, Rock the Vote launched a groundbreaking mobile phone campaign that solicited more than 120,000 sign-ups across the country and helped register as many as 10,000 voters. My personal favorite element of the campaign was that on the night before the election, our subscribers recieved a voice mail instructing them how to locate their polling place through their phone.

Still, it was just a beginning. A new project in San Franscisco has just launched, called Mobile Voter, that shows promise.

The article about Mobile Voter notes that in other countries, mobile phone technology is credited with huge increases in participation. For example, in Spain, where a surge in youth voter turnout helped throw the incumbent party out of power, there were more than 40% more text messages sent on Election Day that normal.

But there are still a lot of unanswered questions about what would be most effective for voter and political engagement. What kind of services and tools would you want to have access to through your mobile device?

As we formulate our mobile campaigns for 2006 and 2008, we could use your input.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

12:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow,

RTV is so dedicated to appeasing terrorists that they won't even leave a post up.

You guys should hang out with Zarqawi for a weekend.

12:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Considering that we can't even assure ourselves that election results are tabulated correctly, I hardly think that what you're doing matters at all. Why don't you work towards encouraging voter verifiable elections so that at least we know our votes are being honestly counted?

9:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

QUOTE:
Ok, well, they arn't sying you can vote over the phone, what they are saying is that you can get information over the phone. there is a big difference. Actually voting over the phone would not work because what if as you are sending you vote, you lose connection and not realize it. every vote counts, and we do not want to lose any.
/QUOTE:

To clarify, *I* wasn't saying what Crock the Vote was doing was phone voting, 'Mike' misintepreted what I was saying.

I'm just saying that being able to verify one's vote after the fact and thus allowing people to know their vote is tabulated correctly and that *counting* is done right is the most important issue with regard to how our elections are run. So I think that Crock The Vote should put their considerable funding towards solutions to that problem, not messing around with mobile phones.

5:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

QUOTE:
Ben Harris said...

wait, wouldn't figuring out this mobile voting thing solve the problem? If we were to have more information, more people woud vote, which is the goal.

4:01 PM
/QUOTE:

Um, No. The problem of being able to verify your vote entails being able to know elections officials tabulated your vote correctly the day after you vote rather than, for example, throwing it away or switching it to a vote for Groucho Marx. Read www.blackboxvoting.org for some more info.

QUOTE:
Ben Harris said...

and why is everone saying crock the vote? I think this program is agood thing, and isn't something to be made fun of!
/QUOTE:

My biggest problem with them is their treatment of the Socialist Insecurity issue, particularly in light of the group of people they claim to represent, young voters. Given how infantile their positions and reasonings are, Crock the Vote most definitely is to be made fun of. If you seriously want to argue otherwise, I invite you to explain how Socialist Insecurity isn't going to be insolvent soon.

5:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

QUOTE:

so what do you suggest we do about the issue?

/QUOTE:

The first thing I advocate that everyone (including you) do is understand why Socialist Insecurity will become insolvent.

Important things to know are that:

1) Soon the SSA will be receiving less in payroll taxes for Social Slavery than it will need to cover its obligations

2) The Socialist Insecurity "Trust Fund", frequently mentioned as an asset the feds can use to make up this shortfall, doesn't actually have any money per se. This is too complicated to explain here but what this means is that any SS shortfall will have to be covered by general government funds and tax revenues.

3) The federal government can't afford to divert any other government funds and tax revenues to SSA. It's busy nation building in Iraq, throwing money down the rathole that is our government school system with "No Child Left Undrugged", paying for grandpa's erections through our new Mediscare Prescription Drug program, and just generally pissing our money away on nonsense. Much of the thanks for this should go to G.W. and his accomplices in congress.

Okay, got all that? There are tons of possible changes you could make after understanding the current situation; some horrible like the Socialist Insecurity Equity Funds that G.W. proposes, some good one of which I will explain presently.

One strategy you could employ would be to be firm that there be no new taxes, payroll or otherwise, and look to cut a huge amount from the total U.S. budget either from general appropriations or from future Socialist Insecurity proposed "benefits". A good start would be to cut about 95% of the spending G.W. has enacted since '00, particularly Mediscare Prescription Drugs, Iraqi Nation Building, and "No Child Left Undrugged". If you understand the mechanics of the "Trust Fund", you'll realize that by cutting general budgetary items, you're freeing up money to be used by the U.S. treasury to pay the IOU's in the fund. You could save trillions cutting just the above. Pfizer and Halliburton might not appreciate it but everyone else will ultimately benefit.

9:13 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Rock the Vote Blog